We're Hiring!
Take the next step in your career and work on diverse technology projects with cross-functional teams.
LEARN MORE
Mountain West Farm Bureau Insurance
office workers empowered by business technology solutions
BLOG
7
10
2019
3.1.2023

Azure Functions and Logic Apps: Differences and When to Use Them

Last updated:
10.15.2020
3.1.2023

Microsoft Azure offers native serverless computing features. Two of the most crucial to master are Azure Functions and Azure Logic Apps. Each of them help enable business logic that automates your Azure workflow, but they have key differences and in fact can be used together in a complementary manner to offer flexible, powerful control over your cloud resources.

Let’s take a closer look at how each of these serverless automation platforms work within Azure and some use cases for them.

Azure Functions execute code using your choice from a wide variety of common modern programming languages like C#, F#, Node.js, Java, and PHO. You pay only for the time your code runs or pay for an unlimited App Service plan based on reserved instances. Functions can integrate with your existing code libraries and Azure platforms, including triggering as part of an Azure Logic App.

Azure Logic Apps are configured within a web portal and can execute your logic without programming any code. This is more simple to administrate as you only need to manage the properties of these logic blocks in your workflow; but it is also less powerful as you can not get as customized or granular as with Functions. However many (over 200) connectors are plug-and-play so Logic Apps are hardly limited. You pay per action or trigger, plus storage.

Here is a chart describing some key differences between Logic Apps and Functions:

 

Azure Functions

Azure Log Apps

Use Cases for Azure Functions and Logic Apps

Because Functions are code-based, you can write, execute, and test them on your local workstation. Any debugging can take place without involving your production cloud environment or provisioning additional (potentially costly) test resources in the cloud. This is also more efficient for your developers.

As mentioned above, Functions also offer more flexibility due to their basis in powerful programming languages. They are also portable into and out of Azure. Some common scenarios for using Functions include:

Logic Apps are preferable when you don’t wish to leverage developer resources and instead use the GUI. They are better suited to integrations as many connectors are available out of the box. Therefore Logic Apps can reduce your time to market in an automation scenario. Some common uses for Logic Apps include:

Of course, mixing and matching between the two is likely to be the correct answer for large scale enterprise cloud environments. Indeed, nesting Functions within your apps might be the most efficient way for some workflows. It all comes down to experimentation and efficiency.

Recent Blog Posts

lunavi logo alternate white and yellow
4.5.2024
03
.
27
.
2024
Utilizing Bicep Parameter Files with ALZ-Bicep

Ready to achieve more efficient Azure Deployments? You can use Bicep parameters instead of JSON which opens new opportunities for deployment. Let Lunavi expert, Joe Thompson, show you how.

Learn more
lunavi logo alternate white and yellow
3.26.2024
03
.
04
.
2024
Anticipating Surges in Cyber Attacks and Bolstering Your InfoSec Defenses in 2024

Learn how to navigate 2024 with the right InfoSec defenses to protect your organization against a rising number of cyber attacks.

Learn more
lunavi logo alternate white and yellow
3.26.2024
01
.
03
.
2024
Microsoft Copilot is Re-Shaping the Innovation Frontier

Microsoft 365 Copilot has been released, and it's changing the way we work. More than OpenAI or ChatGPT, read how Copilot can seamlessly integrate with your workflow.

Learn more