What We’ve Learned Creating AI knowledge Assistants that Actually Work

The Reality Behind AI Assistants

AI assistants are being integrated into apps across industries. It feels like they are everywhere. But building an assistant that can actually deliver results is far more difficult than it sounds.

At Lunavi, we’ve built and deployed multiple AI KnowledgeAssistants designed to help clients access industries. Through extensive testing and refinement, we’ve learned what separates an impressive demo from a dependable business tool.

While some see LLMs or assistants as magic, they aren’t. They’re engineered systems that rely on data quality, cost awareness, testing discipline, and user feedback.

What Is an AI Knowledge Assistant?

An AI Knowledge Assistant combines a Large Language Model (LLM)—such as GPT-4 or GPT-5—with company data sources to provide accurate, conversational answers.

Here’s how it works:

1. A user asks a question.
2. The AI model interprets the question and drafts a response.
3. The assistant retrieves relevant information from company data using Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG).
4. The user receives a clear, contextual answer through a conversational interface.

In short: User → Prompt → LLM + RAG → Response →Feedback.

A Knowledge Assistant helps get clear, accurate answers from company data without digging through documents or systems.

Common Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)

Data: The Foundation of Every AI Knowledge Assistant

Every reliable assistant starts with reliable data. Yet many projects stumble here.

Common data issues include:‍

• Missing or incomplete data sources.
• PDFs or slides with text embedded as images, making them non-searchable.
• Oversized files that exceed token or chunking limits.

How to address them:

• Use OCR (Optical Character Recognition) to extract text during ingestion.
• Chunk large files intelligently before indexing.
• Validate that all critical sources—SharePoint, CRM, websites, manuals—are included.
• Run simulated queries to confirm expected results appear.

If users can’t find an answer, it’s often a data problem rather than a model problem.

Testing: Why Traditional QA Doesn’t Work

Unlike traditional software, AI outputs are non-deterministic—the same question may produce slightly different answers each time. This makes string-based unit testing ineffective.

Lunavi’s solution: AI Testing with AI.

We use another LLM to grade responses for accuracy, completeness, relevance, and precision. Each answer receives a numerical score using a structured grading prompt.

These automated tests run in CI/CD pipelines (such asPlaywright + Allure in Azure DevOps) and store full meta data—from model version to temperature settings—for reproducibility.

The benefits:

• Scalable, repeatable testing.
• Objective performance scoring over time.
• Early detection of data or model drift.

Lessons Learned‍

Across our experience building and maintaining Knowledge Assistants, five principles stand out:

‍

‍Design for constraints.

Token and cost limits define your architecture.

‍

‍

‍

‍Test constantly.

Automated, AI-based testing keeps accuracy high.

‍

‍

‍

‍Close the feedback loop.

Real user input drives relevance and improvement.

‍

‍

‍

‍Keep data fresh.

Regular updates sustain accuracy and trust.

‍

‍

‍

Log everything.

Prompts, models, and results fuel future fine-tuning.

‍

‍

Knowledge Assistants are never truly finished. Their effectiveness depends on continuous refinement based on data and user interaction.

Building Assistants That People Trust

‍

AI is powerful, but its value depends on how responsibly and thoughtfully it’s implemented. Governance, iteration, and empathy matter as much as model selection.

At Lunavi, our mission is to help organizations build intelligent systems that solve real problems, stay accurate, and earn user confidence.

An effective AI Knowledge Assistant is measured by how reliably it helps people find the right information—not by how sophisticated it sounds.

‍

‍